
47 comments
Post CommentSo finally an actual good album release. I don't know if it deserves a 9/10... possible a 7/10. Then records like doomriders, the network, and darkest hour are getting good reviews... Heavy record is correct. First Post, Eat A Dick
*squeezes out several smooth round turd nuggets onto piss poor review of a piss poor album, leaves a little bit stuck to wrinkles rear*
this record is heavy, but not the heaviest record of 2009... neither is BBTS. also, this record is good...but not 9/10 good.
It may be "heavy," but is that what *really* matters, Nicholas?
sleek & sloppy. garlic and bones. fart doctors.
I heard their demo a couple of years ago and it was good, so I'll have to check this out.
if this is heavy....then i'm bored. 6/10
Heaviest record? come on, also way to completely forgot to mention will haven in this. This is a great record, but it deserves a better review with much more knowledge.
Yeah, good band, shit review, par for the course.
9/10 is way too f*cking high for this. It's an alright record, but the new standard for this type of sound? Yeah, whatever. 6-7/10 at the very best
And I'd imagine he didn't mention Will Haven because they f*cking suck.
this reviewer should change his name to heavy idiot
so really low tuning = creative and HEAVY bro i just went to the myspace and if you think this is 9/10 you should be embarrassed because your musical opinion is horrific.
And I'd imagine he didn't mention Will Haven because they f*cking suck. posted by Zach () on 10/20/2009 12:38:08 PM The tone on the guitars, jackass... it reeks of carpe diem. Try a bit harder.
Try a bit harder to do what? Express the fact that Will Haven is f*cking garbage?
bros, bros, come on, just have fun already. queers and retards were meant to be together.
No read most other replies but yes this album does rule. Considering how every review is a 7/10 here the 9/10 does work... although on any other site with better scoring it would be a 7/10.
i've like to wrap my lips around two heavy, beefy, dual leads....if you know what i mean.
I don't like their name. Carpe Diem was good for its time.
for once, a good review from Nick. great album.
okay did anyone else frantically go to their search bar and type in kowloon walled city after reading the first paragraph or so to check them out then procede to throw their computer into the fires of mount doom because what they heard was horrible muddy and really sloppy and just ...well...FRUSTRATINGLY boring????
dudessss you just gotta be in the right state of mind..NAH MEAN
Will Haven is stoked. Review FLip!!
No chocolate thunder, you must have clicked on another band called that. I supposed you want lifeless Zeuss production?
the bass tone is unbelievable? based on what? the fret clacking or the fact that his amp is physically uncapable of clearly producing the crap he slamming out. and the guitars sound like they were played with a crate practice amp and a boss metal zone.
its not even the recording that has me it just sounds like everyones instruments are broken OR just shitty to begin with like jeff was saying in the end the mix sounds nice everythings balanced its just a balance of shit and c-m drenched placentas
album rules. does sound a little will havenish but since will haven hasnt written a decent song in like 10 years, its nice to see a band succeed at that sound. shits heavy and awesome. recording is ok, especially since this isnt victory or trustkill gay-metal.
stay away from cds that sound like...neurosis, isis, baroness, intronaut, blah blah blah blah....same shit over and over and over again
they have the album up on their website for free i can kinda see why. i'm dozing off here a bit
neurosis, isis, and intronaut are some of my favorite bands >:O
stay away from cds that sound like...neurosis, isis, baroness, intronaut, blah blah blah blah....same shit over and over and over again posted by () on 10/22/2009 4:43:41 PM This cd has a little Baroness Flourish in one song it doesn't sound like Isis, It doesn't sound like Intronaut and it doesn't sound like Neurosis either.
Just listened on their MySpace page and their older stuff is better than this groove-wankery. I just don't understand this overly groovy music that has nothing else to offer.
Other than Unsane, I don't get any of the comparisons. Review should just say "if you like Unsane, you'll probably like this, if you don't...."
yeah. this is exactly what Unsane would sound like if you took out everything that makes them good.
they actually have really loud gear with the exception of the shit bass player.
Loud, clean bass tones with tons of gain probably sound like shit with garbage enhanced-bass headphones. Heavy is an aesthetic you f*cking retards, an aesthetic this band has figured out. All the low frequency recording tricks in the world couldn't make haircut hardcore heavy. also, lol at all the newgays who've never listened to sludge or noise rock before. If you're bored by this shit, I'm sure there are plenty of windmill bands engaging in instrumental histrionics for you c*nts to sin
oh great another one of these gay bands. lets all dangle from their nuts gays. f*cking gays