Hate on Jake all you want, but at least know wtf you're talking about while doing it
^ This is a good take, and I agree. I think the bone of contention comes from the fact he never acknowledged the source material. If he changed it dramatically then fair play, but he clearly just changed the curves and vectorised it. Even in the booklet he could have said, "Photo used without permission", but for years he paraded it around like he created it from the ground up.
Hate on Jake all you want, but at least know wtf you're talking about while doing it ^ This is a good take, and I agree. I think the bone of contention comes from the fact he never acknowledged the source material. If he changed it dramatically then fair play, but he clearly just changed the curves and vectorised it. Even in the booklet he could have said, "Photo used without permission", but for years he paraded it around like he created it from the ground up.