
20 comments
Post Commentthis band just sucks, really no reason to write such a long review
and haha @ cover art.. man these guys arent even trying
wack band, no good. but what does the first paragraph have to do with ANYTHING
blood and ink signs the worst bands ever. please no more reviews on releases from this label.
I f*cking love Kirby's reviews. Know why? BECAUSE THE MAN HAS OPINIONS AND ISN'T AFRAID TO SPEAK THEM! Doing a review and simply rearyzing the album is kiddie shit, anyone can do that...ironically that's what most of the messageboard posters have been asking from my reviews...but it takes a real man with experience and a mind of his own to write reviews like Kirby's. Keep it up, I'm rooting for you all the way. Keep going off on tangents and personalizing the review. It's what makes us individua
complete thrash , the worst thing I've heard so far this year !
There is, of course, plenty of room for your opinions in your record reviews. That's what a record review is: your opinion. On a record. We ask that you keep other, inconsequential opinons to yourself, however. We come here to read about music; going on *at length* about anything else is self-indulgence, nothing more. Sincerely, The Herd.
Including your opinion is fine, just keep it brief. The first paragraph should have been no more than two sentences--the readers will get your point. And musically speaking, I have no idea what this band sounds like. They have "chugga-chugga parts," "catchy riffs," "emo/"screamo"/indie/straight up rock tendencies," and are similar to a bunch of bands I've never heard. Next time, less yammering about your paradigm and more music review.
The 4/10 should tell you all you need to know about the music...you need to actually read about how the 4/10 songs break down? Man, you're a retard! If an album is 4/10, a fun, indulgent review is much more warranted than a serious rearysis of the music. Start using your brain, jackass.
The 4/10 should tell you all you need to know about the music...you need to actually read about how the 4/10 songs break down? Man, you're a retard! If an album is 4/10, a fun, indulgent review is much more warranted than a serious rearysis of the music. Start using your brain, jackass.
this record could have been summed up as "shitty nu-emo buttcore." and gluck, this review was 2489 times more legible than any sort of tripe that comes out of your c-m-and-tomato-sauce-encrusted keyboard. kill yourself.
why the hell even bother with review if only the rating matters? gluck's a f*cking genius
Christcore=coke and 14 year old hussies. Enlow keeps this tradition.
If have no interest in talking about or rearyzing music, if you think that an arbitrary numerical score is all one needs to know about a record, then you are a pundit, not a fan of music, and have absolutely no right to be reviewing records. Start a blog.
Good records need to be showered with well-thought out and researched praise. Bad records need to be either not reviewed, or briefly shat on, or used as a vehicle for a self-indulgent review. That is my stance and you can kiss my pee hole.
what a shitty label. didnt they sign that one f*cking band that has like, 7 members all with the same retarded haircut?