this is a horrible f*cking review. if you want to tell us everything about your personal taste and opinions aside from the band then do it in the biography. dont waste my time trying to skim through unnecessarily wordy bullshit to see what the album is like.
It sounds like the reviewer has a little sand in his vjayjay...
Why did this record take so long to be reviewed? It's been out for several months.
Unlike the fickle fruits aka lambgoat peanut gallery, I really enjoy when a reviewer who has a brain and experience starts off on a tangent and then wanders some more, all the while reviewing the album. Maybe it's because I sometimes do the same. Maybe it's because some reviewers are actually people with interesting lives and opinions. Great review.
imagine each of those words is a rock that you have to put in your backpack before trudging up a hill...
thanks for your entire life story kirby
Holy asshat Bat-Man. Coming from someone who can trail off like the rest of them, I wanted nothing more to just stop you mid sentence and tell you to get to the point. This isn't LiveJournal, dude nor your MySpace "About Me" section. This is an album review. I didn't even get to read the review because by the time I finished the first paragraph I had forgotten what I was reading and that I was sitting at a computer in general. Stop justifying yourself and flexing your proverbial musical muscles.
i literally dozed off while reading that first paragraph
normally i think that all the people who bitch at lambgoat reviews are just idiots. but this review . . .
so... 15 years in the scene, you are 27.... you were listening to hardcore at age 12? that is pretty f*cking tough nigga
this cd is the reincarnation of napalm death from their scum/from enslavement to obliteration-era. it's worthy of a 8/10 score.
So I read this review, then went out to get a snack. I asked the assistant what the year was and she replied "it's 2007".
"you were listening to hardcore at age 12?" I was 12 when I got into hardcore. It happens. I haven't heard this band, but the review is good. The "extra" stuff was poignant and, not only that, pretty funny. Yeah...
I also don't think most complaints about reviews on here have any merit, but...edit. Edit, edit, edit. Most of this review doesn't need to be here, or serve any purpose.
The first graph was largely unnecessary - reduce it to a two sentence intro and strike the biographical digressions. The fifth paragraph should be two-thirds shorter. There's no need to overstate your point--give your readers some credit.
Awful review. Dont get some jerk to review a grind album if they dont even like the grind genre. He has no respect for it, and therefore has no buisiness reviewing this album. Thus his opinion = shit.
i find the firsst half of this review rather upsetting
When it comes to reviews in general, I'm willing to give anything a shot. Regardless of the length, I'll read it, check it out and give my honest penis of the complete package (words, style, layout) and while that opinion might not be set in stone eternally, it was at the time I read it and meditated on the whole offering. At nearly 27 years of age, I cannot say that I am an "old dude" in the reading scene (far from it), but with my exposure to various styles of litterature output for the last 1
it figures that the only post defending kirby's review is tlnr.
anyone notice that typo in like the first sentence? that was a typo right? "put in on" should have been put IT on, no? oh well, kirby is a f*cking idiot
that was probably the worst review i ever read. webby... what happened here?
Wow, I don't care what you little pee-on's think of my review. I know that it gets the point across. I've been in the scene for 15 years, I've been listening to burtal music for 15 f*cking years, you little piss ants got into it last year when you saw a killswitch video
"nice story..tell it to readers digest" -Dave Mustaine.. HAHA, hilarious good band..8/10